Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian Version of the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening: Children up to Two Years Old
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20435/pssa.v1i1.3002Keywords:
evaluation studies, validation studies, child developmentAbstract
Introduction: The Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening was adapted for Brazil (BDIS-BR), but its psychometric properties have not yet been tested. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric evidence of the BDIS-BR in 282 children under two years of age. Methods: The validity based on the internal structure was verified using Mokken Models, and convergent and concurrent validity were verified through age trends and comparison with the Denver II Test. Results: The BDIS-BR was shown to be a unidimensional measure and the empirical ordering of the items was similar to the original. Regarding convergent and concurrent validity, the results in the BDIS-BR showed a strong positive association with the age of the children (ρ = 0.92; p = 0.001), and high levels of agreement with the Denver II Test (86% to 96%). Conclusion: The BDIS-BR is a child development screening instrument with good psychometric properties and can contribute to the assessment of Brazilian children.
References
Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. (2014). Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil 2015(p.1–6).
Albuquerque, K. A. de, & Cunha, A. C. B. (2020). New trends in instruments for child development screening in Brazil: A systematic review. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 30(2), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.v30.10366
Albuquerque, K. A., Cunha, A. C. B., & Berkovits, M. D. (2022). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Battelle Development Inventory, for Brazil. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 39, e190170. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202239e190170
Baghaei, P. (2021). Mokken Scale analysis in language assessment. Waxmann Verlag GMbH.
Darling, J. C., Bamidis, P. D., Burberry, J., & Rudolf, M. C. (2020). The First Thousand Days: Early, integrated and evidence-based approaches to improving child health –Coming to a population near you? Archives of disease in childhood, 105(9), 837–841.
Elbaum, B., Gattamorta, K. A., & Penfield, R. D. (2010). Evaluation of the Battelle Developmental Inventory, 2nd Edition, Screening Test for Use in States’ Child Outcomes Measurement Systems Under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Journal of Early Intervention, 32(4), 255–274.
Febrina, F., Lawalata, V. C. P., & Ramli, Y. (2023). Factors associated with cognitive and communication delay in children aged 0 to 3 years using the Battelle-Developmental Inventory, 2nd edition. Paediatric a Indonesiana, 63(4), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.14238/pi63.4.2023.282-9
Filgueiras, A., Pires, P., Maissonette, S., & Landeira-Fernandez, J. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Brazilian-adapted version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire in public child daycare centers. Early Human Development, 89(8), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.02.005
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2023). Pessoas com deficiência 2022: PNAD contínua. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv102013_informativo.pdf
Lee, D., Bagnato, S., & Pretti-Frontczak, K. (2016). Utility and Validity of Authentic Assessments and Conventional Tests for International Early Childhood Intervention Purposes: Evidence from U.S. National Social Validity Research. Journal of Intellectual Disability – Diagnosis and Treatment, 3(4), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2015.03.04.2
Lopez Boo, F., Cubides Mateus, M., & Llonch Sabatés, A. (2020). Initial psychometric properties of the Denver II in a sample from Northeast Brazil. Infant Behavior and Development, 58, 101391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.101391
Macy, M., Bagnato, S. J., Macy, R. S., & Salaway, J. (2015). Conventional Tests and Testing for Early Intervention Eligibility: Is There an Evidence Base? Infants and Young Children, 28(2), 182–204. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000032
Madaschi, V., Mecca, T. P., Macedo, E. C., & Paula, C. S. (2016). Bayley-III Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: Transcultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 26(64), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272664201606
Morris, A. S., Wakschlag, L., Krogh-Jespersen, S., Fox, N., Planalp, B., Perlman, S. B., Shuffrey, L. C., Smith, B., Lorenzo, N. E., Amso, D., Coles, C. D., & Johnson, S. P. (2020). Principles for Guiding the Selection of Early Childhood Neurodevelopmental Risk and Resilience Measures: HEALthy Brain and Child Development Study as an Exemplar. Adversity and Resilience Science, 1(4), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42844-020-00025-3
Munoz-Chereau, B., Ang, L., Dockrell, J., Outhwaite, L., & Heffernan, C. (2021). Measuring early child development across low and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 19(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X211020031
Newborg, J. (2005). Battelle Developmental Inventory, 2nd edition, Examiner’s Manual (2º ed.). Riverside Publishing.
Papalia, D. E; Martorell, G. (2022). Desenvolvimento humano (14ªed). AMGH.
Peters, W. J., & Matson, J. L. (2020). The Relationship Between Developmental Functioning and Screening Outcome for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 32(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09689-x
Prieto, J. A., Cueto, S., Carballo-Fazanes, A., & Abelairas, C. (2022). Psychomotor development disorders in apparently healthy children and considerations of family evaluation. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise.17(3), 518–527. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2022.173.04
Richardson, K. P. (2010). Use of standardized tests in pediatric practice. In Occupational Therapy for Children (p. 216–243). Mosby.
Romo-Pardo, B., Liendo-Vallejos, S., Vargas-López, G., Rizzoli-Córdoba, A., &Buenrostro-Márquez, G. (2012). Pruebas de tamizaje de neurodesarrollo global para niños menores de 5 años de edad validadas en Estados Unidos y Latinoamérica: Revisión sistemática y análisis comparativo. Boletin Medico del Hospital Infantil de Mexico, 69(6), 450–462.
Rumsey, D. J. (2023). What is r value correlation? Dummies. https://www.dummies.com/article/academics-the-arts/math/statistics/how-to-interpret-a-correlation-coefficient-r-169792/
Sabanathan, S., Wills, B., & Gladstone, M. (2015). Child development assessment tools in low-income and middle-income countries: How can we use them more appropriately? Archives of Disease in Childhood, 100(5), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-308114
Santos, J. A. T., Ayupe, K. M. A., Lima, A. L. O., Albuquerque, K. A. de, Morgado, F. F. da R., & Gutierres Filho, P. J. B. (2022). Propriedades psicométricas da versão brasileira do Denver II: Teste de triagem do desenvolvimento. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 27, 1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232022273.40092020
Van Der Ark, L. A. (2012). New Developments in Mokken Scale Analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(5), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i05
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles published on journal Psicologia e Saúde holds the copyrights of all texts published by it. Due to that, there is a demand for a letter of copyright cession (see Appreciation). The full reproduction of any article of this Journal in other publications, by any means, requires a written authorization of the Editorial Board. Partial reproductions of articles (abstracts, more than 500 words of text, tables, pictures and other illustrations, sound files) should have the written permission of the Editorial Board and the Authors.
.jpg){kind=small}
